Open is finally dead.

2cwldys

Supremacy Maintainer
Donator
Posts
321
Likes
399
Nah, it died because the developers catered to a small group of whiny competitive players, nerfed everything into uselessness, and dismissed constructive feedback by labeling it as toxic whenever it didn’t align with their vision.
If anything is more likely to harm this game in the long run, it’s not the community, it’s the egos of the developers behind gameplay changes.
Always remember, this game ONLY survives because of its community. :)

Your post lands the hammer on the nail, and we can't just blame the death of Open completely on legends like most do.

It's OK at least in recent weeks they exclusively play open now in private lobbies, so I guess they stay out of people's way now.
Better than fighting their skill stack in open because they like to all get on the same team in a VC VS casuals till they make everyone RQ.
What I find funny though is if you beat any of them they're likely the ones to ragequit first, after some consequential yapping.

It's alright tho we have a scrimmer on the dev team recently who likes to shout at you about bad nades, without them having to wait for months with a reply to their dev application for due process, as the balance lead now. Nepotism at it's finest. When you're Frenzy's friend you can get into anything. Everything's gonna be great!
 
Posts
352
Likes
140
I have seen your ideas and they are absolute dogshit. You are literally the laughing stock of the forums.

1608658630838.png

1608658712916.png

1608658738634.png

1608658764496.png

1608658799817.png

1608659109755.png

1608659145574.png

1608659185320.png



I don't think anyone would listen to you.​

They were a step in the right direction, they listened to some of my proposals and put them in after years
 
Posts
127
Likes
406
Nah, it died because the developers catered to a small group of whiny competitive players, nerfed everything into uselessness, and dismissed constructive feedback by labeling it as toxic whenever it didn’t align with their vision.
If anything is more likely to harm this game in the long run, it’s not the community, it’s the egos of the developers behind gameplay changes.
Always remember, this game ONLY survives because of its community. :)
Fucking hell, Bob woke up and decided to speak FACTS
 
Posts
289
Likes
265
Nah, it died because the developers catered to a small group of whiny competitive players, nerfed everything into uselessness, and dismissed constructive feedback by labeling it as toxic whenever it didn’t align with their vision.
If anything is more likely to harm this game in the long run, it’s not the community, it’s the egos of the developers behind gameplay changes.
Always remember, this game ONLY survives because of its community. :)

Now that's funny coming from someone that participated in the extinction of the competitive ability of this game.
What a sorry thing to read.

Quelle autruche, incroyable.
 

Leons

Saber & UI Dev
Moderator
Movie Battles II Team
Posts
460
Likes
686
Now that's funny coming from someone that participated in the extinction of the competitive ability of this game.
What a sorry thing to read.

Quelle autruche, incroyable.
whats competitive about rng shooter where you can play with third person, cvars to remove every unwanted visible thing to give you an advantage, camera/target damp to make you see where you shouldnt and just overall trash gunplay
 

Bob-Billy

KotOR Mapper & Cultist
Moderator
Movie Battles II Team
Posts
402
Likes
1,369
Now that's funny coming from someone that participated in the extinction of the competitive ability of this game.
What a sorry thing to read.

Quelle autruche, incroyable.
In case you didn’t know, there’s still a strong competitive community in both the EU and NA regions, which makes up most of the players still active in open mode. My previous comment referred to the NA side, as they’re the ones feeding ideas to the gameplay devs, since they're part of the same group. To be clear, I’d never suggest that EU competitive players get taken seriously or listened to. Well, maybe Thera gets a nod now and then (one more FP on the bowcaster, hell yeah!). Whenever the NA side loses to something, it ends up getting nerfed, they easily get hyperfocused on things that kill them. Ironically, even if they made open mode worse, it wouldn’t stop CE7 from beating them in tournaments, which is probably what really bothers them lol.

But that’s okay, I wouldn’t expect you to be a competitive player anyway. I’m sure you’re highly competitive in other areas though, like complaining about being harassed by ghosts or having full schizo breakdowns in moderators DMs. For that, you’ve probably earned the Diamond rank more than once! :p
 

MaceMadunusus

Level Designer
Donator
Movie Battles II Team Retired
Posts
1,989
Likes
2,826
In case you didn’t know, there’s still a strong competitive community in both the EU and NA regions, which makes up most of the players still active in open mode. My previous comment referred to the NA side, as they’re the ones feeding ideas to the gameplay devs, since they're part of the same group.


Yeah this was something I fought against a lot when I was in. It always felt like "flavor of the weeek" discussions in beta test chat that centered entirely around emotions from recent scrim matches rather than trying to find out where the actual balance problems are. Often applying hammers to simply changed balance values (like damage) rather than messing more with accuracies, ammo, etc because at the time those would have required detangling things. It was fucking annoying to fight against, and I personally had a plan to tackle things in specific logical balance groups, but no it always had to be RIGHT NOW when something bothered scrim people.

Though just want to note a point of clarity, there are points in mb2s past where EUs competitive community was favored in the same way.
 

kvinto

Movie Battles II Team
Posts
334
Likes
820
whats competitive about rng shooter where you can play with third person, cvars to remove every unwanted visible thing to give you an advantage, camera/target damp to make you see where you shouldnt and just overall trash gunplay
In case you didn’t know, there’s still a strong competitive community in both the EU and NA regions, which makes up most of the players still active in open mode. My previous comment referred to the NA side, as they’re the ones feeding ideas to the gameplay devs, since they're part of the same group. To be clear, I’d never suggest that EU competitive players get taken seriously or listened to. Well, maybe Thera gets a nod now and then (one more FP on the bowcaster, hell yeah!). Whenever the NA side loses to something, it ends up getting nerfed, they easily get hyperfocused on things that kill them. Ironically, even if they made open mode worse, it wouldn’t stop CE7 from beating them in tournaments, which is probably what really bothers them lol.

But that’s okay, I wouldn’t expect you to be a competitive player anyway. I’m sure you’re highly competitive in other areas though, like complaining about being harassed by ghosts or having full schizo breakdowns in moderators DMs. For that, you’ve probably earned the Diamond rank more than once! :p

moviebattles-2-movie-battles-2.gif
 

Noob

Just a Guy
Donator
Moderator
Movie Battles II Team
Posts
1,557
Likes
1,689
In case you didn’t know, there’s still a strong competitive community in both the EU and NA regions, which makes up most of the players still active in open mode. My previous comment referred to the NA side, as they’re the ones feeding ideas to the gameplay devs, since they're part of the same group. To be clear, I’d never suggest that EU competitive players get taken seriously or listened to. Well, maybe Thera gets a nod now and then (one more FP on the bowcaster, hell yeah!). Whenever the NA side loses to something, it ends up getting nerfed, they easily get hyperfocused on things that kill them. Ironically, even if they made open mode worse, it wouldn’t stop CE7 from beating them in tournaments, which is probably what really bothers them lol.

But that’s okay, I wouldn’t expect you to be a competitive player anyway. I’m sure you’re highly competitive in other areas though, like complaining about being harassed by ghosts or having full schizo breakdowns in moderators DMs. For that, you’ve probably earned the Diamond rank more than once! :p
There's no passion left behind anything
 

Goosto

FA / Legends Contributor
Internal Beta Team
Posts
93
Likes
88
As someone with a stake in the contributor/beta/dev/open/legends/scrim/troll scenes, I think you guys are being extremely over dramatic and paranoid.

The scrimmers are the majority of the ones joining the beta team, playtesting, and providing feedback for the devs over voice, so of course there is going to be a mild bias, but every dev I've talked to does not take their word as 100% gospel. For instance, Frenzy made Echo changes based purely on improving Open gameplay and some scrimmers hate that decision to this day, but he has stuck by it.

I think R20 had the right idea but was rushed and bloated, the numbers were off and beta testing fell off when it should have been at its most populated (where were the complainers?), resulting in hilariously obvious missed bugs.

I do think the devs need to play their own game more (amongst the commoners) and I do think some scrimmers make emotional snap judgments, fwiw.

(At least NA) scrims aren't really that sweaty, it's just fun to voice chat and coordinate. Lot of good guys in there.

Legends is more popular because it's funnier and more laidback, changes can more easily be made to the mode to keep it fresh or address balance, and classes have more robust kits and have more lives/bigger health pools/more mobility than their Open counterparts, which DOES actually fix a lot of the "problems" many have with Open. Not to mention the playerbase tend to switch maps up when Open is dotf classic half the fucking time. (And now you realize how many players are basing their balance ideas on 2 hallways... I shudder at the thought)
 

MaceMadunusus

Level Designer
Donator
Movie Battles II Team Retired
Posts
1,989
Likes
2,826
As someone with a stake in the contributor/beta/dev/open/legends/scrim/troll scenes, I think you guys are being extremely over dramatic and paranoid.

Something to keep in mind, at least regarding my statements, is that it is something I have dealt with for a long time. Much longer than most beta testers, and a good part of the development team (Such as Frenzy) have even bee a part of the process. Certain periods were better, certain periods were worse. However, from a developer perspective: there have been times where I have had a highly motivated day to work on MB2, but then because beta testers have their flavor of the week and its super important to them so it must be discussed right now. In my perspective, I've seen a constant trend of inexperienced developers listening to the loudest in the community, so it often means I have to spend time time trying to convince people to stop going the band-aid route because everyone is amateurs rather than professionals. Over the years it has wasted tons of time from both beta testers and developers, arguing over stupid little things like were some government bureaucracy and never actually getting things done.

Just as an example, the scrim community decided one month that A-280 was a massive problem, even though balance had not changed for the weapon in like a decade. I agreed that there were issues, but beta testers/scrimmers were adamant it had to be immediately solved with their balance values the moment it was discovered. Where as my method was slow, methodical, anti-band-aid, group based balance changes. As part of my overall class update plan, weapons like A-280, DLT-20a, Westar M5, would have had a lot of their balance values detangled from one another. Things like accuracy are the same for half the weapons in MB2, and many of the projectile speeds are all the same. Other balance values like ammo costs, magazine size, reload times, etc are buried so deep in code its impossible to easily modify. Past MB2 developers kept tacking multipliers-on-multipliers in order to do things like projectile speed increases or FP drain modifications. Multiple global-modifiers, multiple sub modifiers etc. Everything needed to be cleaned up and myself, tempest, etc. needed time to clean all of that up and unlock all possible balancing options and stop the slow cascading failures. All those discussions and stuff wasted a fuck ton of time trying to convince people to follow basic proper game design/efficiency/optimization related ideas.

It feels like I wasted 12 years of my life trying to convince people to just follow what I consider basic common sense. Like hey, we need to be able to balance a weapon with ALL values, not just damage, burst count, or FP drain. And it just partially results in the next part of what you mentioned:
I think R20 had the right idea but was rushed and bloated, the numbers were off and beta testing fell off when it should have been at its most populated (where were the complainers?), resulting in hilariously obvious missed bugs.

It was rushed and bloated, because 75% of the features for that release were decided last minute, against the goals of leadership, and the result of beta testers and two rogue developers forcing things rather than sticking with the plan that was decided years in advance, and cemented as the plan for the release months beforehand. It has nothing to do with developers not playing the game. Such a statement is baffling to me when, one of the people responsible for a large majority of the "hilariously obvious missed bugs" was someone who was on the scrim discord, playing and testing with scrimmers on a weekly basis. You would think someone playing and testing that often would have spotted obvious things, and would be able to avoid them when they're modifying core parts of mb2s code base.... but no and its been a frequent problem with that specific developer missing the obvious because their communication skills with the rest of the development team sucks ass and I can even provide a good example of that. If we would have stuck to the original plan, we wouldn't have had issues, and if we had people in the development team that developed as a team and not solo developers, we wouldn't have so many problems. And with that I'll give an example of why I say this, while also addressing another part of your comment:

Legends is more popular because it's funnier and more laidback, changes can more easily be made to the mode to keep it fresh or address balance, and classes have more robust kits and have more lives/bigger health pools/more mobility than their Open counterparts, which DOES actually fix a lot of the "problems" many have with Open.

Which to me is a little hilarious, because a lot of the backend changes I was championing were for the purpose of making much faster balance changes overall. A lot of MB2s balance values were in random files and locations within 10s of thousands of lines of code, often impossible to find, tied to other things, or stacked on top of previous balance changes. Tempest and I worked really hard to centralize all of that in a single easy to read location, which also allowed them to be read into the UI for even players to see. It is something that should have been finished years ago, but has faced resistance due to flavor-of-the week issues taking priority. We also had a list of plans, multiple years old (just look at the date on the thread that is just combining things into a single location as most ideas are way older), that gave classes more options. Below is an example of things just written down, but also notice that there are at least 3 new classes on this as well.

43f575eb3ecc19c6b0e86531250fd639.jpg


It is also absolutely hilarious seeing the legends system nowadays, especially with some people taking credit for the idea. Here is a news article we published on ModDB of the legends system existing in 2009: From the MB2 Labs: A New Gamemode news - Movie Battles II mod for Star Wars: Jedi Academy Far before any of those people joined the dev team.

  • If you do not create an SA, a default one will be used. Currently, the SA defaults emulate the MB Open mode classes. This effectively turns your SA into per class limits on the MB Open mode classes.
That right there sounds like even Legends itself.

However, the person who worked on the current system never discussed it with the team as a whole before creating it and getting it to the point where it was mostly complete. Thus wasting weeks, months, whatever of his own time when I had part of this system still lying around on my machine. That version that I had would have also solved a few of the issues that cropped up post-release if they followed the initial game plan and communicated and designed things with the rest of the team, rather than on their own. Some people on the dev team think they know better or more than those that have been around longer, yet their ideas are decades old and belong to others.

We had the opportunity years ago, to get Open to a much better place. That chance was completely squandered by a selfish few.
 
Top