Search results

ERROR: Cannot process drawable data from user "Goliath-A.I.". WARNING: Variable "assistance" == null; check variable assignment. FATAL ERROR: com.dalolorn.AIRuntimeError: java.lang.NullPointerException at com.dalolorn.modules.Language; at...

Uhh, new log, this one's a little fatter than most. From what I remember (it happened yesterday, so bear with me :P), I was in the middle of a DotF game (as noted above, the issue will sometimes occur if I've been playing too long) when suddenly the game went black and terminated itself...

I hope the incoming patch will enable me to join the 'not everyone' group. :(

@Fang That always happens... first time I've seen it fly off at such an angle to kill someone to the Jedi's side, though. (I've had instances when I 'shot' or better, 'sniped' a Sith I was dueling with, without actively deflecting.)

Well, according to Tempest, the M5 will have 360/480/600 ammo in the next patch. Just giving a heads up to those not on the Discord chat. :p Edit: Just watched your 'credentials' videos. The long one feels almost like a 'Join ARC now!' recruitment thing with all the stunts you've pulled off -...

@Damn Polak If previous posts in this thread are accurate, then droideka blasters already converge on the crosshair, just as has been suggested for duals.

That works too. (Honestly, I never use bounce shots - but you do have a good point.)

Perhaps the shots should just always converge on whatever obstacle the crosshair's pointing at. I mean, let's be realistic for a moment - if you're trying to aim at a person, you're not going to suddenly decide to shoot to his sides just because you have two pistols, you'll want to point both of...

Eh, I was actually fine with 1.4.2. Like I posted in the Dueling Compendium thread, 1.4 smoothened the learning curve to the point where it was almost a proper curve rather than a piece of abstract art. Now we're back to abstract art again, except with even more sudden 'skill leaps' than in 1.3...

Unfortunately, it's pretty generic stuff - I don't think it'll be much use. (Edit: On second thought, it does have a teeny tiny stack trace and the name of the module that's causing the crashes, so... maybe? *shrugs*) I've uploaded a whole bunch of crash logs that have accumulated since I last...

Saber-to-saber combat has generally fallen to pieces in 1.4.3, I'm afraid. Nope, very little advice here. I actually find that I can sometimes be pulled (but not disarmed) when I'm not running, which definitely bolsters the 'pull towards saberist' thing. Yes, grip has been like that for as...

Mine doesn't cut to black - it either just skips to the 'crash to desktop' stage or freezes on the loading screen and waits for me to tell Windows to kill it.

They're called Kubaz, not Garindans. The spy class sounds like a nice way of putting in all sorts of FA-exclusive stuff - forcefields, drones, turrets, all sorts of things could pop in.

64-bit Win10 here, it's been happening since I updated to 1.4 (could have been 1.3 causing it, though - I skipped a version). I find that sometimes the crash will fail to occur if some or all of the following conditions are met: 1. There aren't a lot of people in the server. 2. There has only...

Lower your graphics settings, perhaps? I don't remember having such issues, but I don't run dynamic glows and/or lights.

And what of it?

@Oddlewad You could simply force a player to choose between 'Blaster' or 'Saber Style' skills. Maybe no saber defense if they take a blaster, or just outright forbid saber styles like with the M5's attachments. Of course, since there appears to be a limit on how many skill types a class can...

I just turned in my lightsaber and started playing ARC full-time. Heavens preserve me if I have to join the Imperial team, though... (Dexterity 3 provides me with a much better chance of not getting shot down in the first several seconds of an engagement, and the M5 seems to have gained 100%...

Me, I'd go with SeV's idea instead. Buuuut I might be biased due to favoring a defensive playstyle in 1.4.2. I seemed to be channeling Soresu most of the time. :oops:

To be honest, it's not quite the direction I'd take it in. (I think it was SeV who suggested an alternative direction which sounds interesting to me.) The question right now is whether the current course can be polished enough that it won't be... well, what it is right now.