How much of the Saber system is being changed next update?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Posts
69
Likes
19
I am asking because I don't know if I want to spend hours upon hours learning the current saber-system if the new one is going to do away with what I've learned.

Honestly I am not looking for details here, I am just wondering if I should still spend time learning the current one or if I should wait for the new one and then practice like a madman.

If you can't answer, then that's fine too. At worst, I'll just have to wait.
 

Supa

The Serial Stacker
Movie Battles II Team Retired
Posts
914
Likes
356
The basic mechanics will stay the same, for the most part. If I were to ever relearn the saber system I would focus on perfect blocking and perfecting combos in a way that wouldn't draw perfect blocks, as those are constants that will always present and prevalent in some form or another.

That's all I can really say about it. If Stassin wants to go in depth he can with the permission of leadership, but if not you'll just have to wait until the next big patch. ;)
 

Stassin

Donator
Movie Battles II Team Retired
Posts
824
Likes
925
Actually even though some of the basic mechanics will remain pretty similar, there are quite a few core changes for some others. So yeah it's a complete revamp, no surprise on that.

But practicing the current one still obviously helps. Someone who is very good with the current system will immediately be good with the new one compared to someone who discovers the whole game, that goes without saying.
 
Posts
36
Likes
74
Actually even though some of the basic mechanics will remain pretty similar, there are quite a few core changes for some others. So yeah it's a complete revamp, no surprise on that.

But practicing the current one still obviously helps. Someone who is very good with the current system will immediately be good with the new one compared to someone who discovers the whole game, that goes without saying.

Based on Supa's and your response, does that mean you're keeping the new perfect block system intact and retiring the old one for good? I think it'd be a good idea to go back to the old PB system and focus on making it consistent instead of keeping what you have now, even though you created it.

The only opposition I saw in previous threads about hitboxes being tied to the saber was Sev's comments saying that it would be too friendly for yaw'ing and people would hold block and wiggle their mouse left and right to block. But currently the core strategy of getting through this new PB system is doing extremely fast, high sensitivity yawed swings in an attempt to connect them before your opponent can angle their camera in time - this is the most yaw relevant and intensive build to exist as of now...

I'm afraid if you leave the old PB system behind you'll leave behind part of a very strong foundation of MB2 dueling with it, and what you'll keep is the 3 saber savvy testers telling you it's good (exaggerated, but the point is there), and the swarm of new players who also think it's good because they've never played the previous builds. Most of the duelists I've seen on NA have retired the saber with this new PB/perk system, and most of the ones who love it didn't really pick up dueling until now.

Are you planning on keeping PB how it is?
 

Preston

Nerd
Posts
1,022
Likes
653
Pls be good pls be good pls be good :D

Also I personally love tye currebt pblock system. Dun sue me
 

Stassin

Donator
Movie Battles II Team Retired
Posts
824
Likes
925
Based on Supa's and your response, does that mean you're keeping the new perfect block system intact and retiring the old one for good? I think it'd be a good idea to go back to the old PB system and focus on making it consistent instead of keeping what you have now, even though you created it.

The only opposition I saw in previous threads about hitboxes being tied to the saber was Sev's comments saying that it would be too friendly for yaw'ing and people would hold block and wiggle their mouse left and right to block. But currently the core strategy of getting through this new PB system is doing extremely fast, high sensitivity yawed swings in an attempt to connect them before your opponent can angle their camera in time - this is the most yaw relevant and intensive build to exist as of now...

I'm afraid if you leave the old PB system behind you'll leave behind part of a very strong foundation of MB2 dueling with it, and what you'll keep is the 3 saber savvy testers telling you it's good (exaggerated, but the point is there), and the swarm of new players who also think it's good because they've never played the previous builds. Most of the duelists I've seen on NA have retired the saber with this new PB/perk system, and most of the ones who love it didn't really pick up dueling until now.

Are you planning on keeping PB how it is?
I had some idea while working on the upcoming revamp, which would be to make saber hitboxes temprorarily larger when looking for saber/saber collisions when swinging, so that the old PB method would actually be reliable (because otherwise it is not reliable at all). But didn't go through with it, didn't even try in fact.

And i will have to correct your argument: aiming so that your swing hits as fast as possible isn't tied to the current PBing system. It is as its description suggests, to make swings hit as soon as they reach their threatening phase, and not slightly after. It was used just the same with the old PB system. On the other hand, abusing animation chaos by moving the camera alot to bypass PB is not possible with the current PB system (other than trying to confuse the opponent with it) while it was with the old one. Why ? Simply because the base game is like that. Saber animations are pretty diverse and saber hitboxes are tiny, you can't expect a reliable blocking system relying only on saber/saber collision with the classical animations from base. All animations would need to be carefully designed so that there is no room to abuse camera position to bypass PB, and they aren't. And if they were, what do you think the end result would be ? PB by aiming with your saber roughly where the incoming swing is located, which is what the current system's PB is trying to simulate.

In the end, this "old PB system" we're talking about is actually nothing more than the blocking system inherited from base. And it is something very unpolished. If it were polished to the point of being completely reliable (not sure if really possible at all, i see only the possibility of making saber hitboxes bigger atm), i would see no disadvantage in having it; only the advantage of being visually better i suppose.

But there are many possibilities anyways, you know ? Why would "having sabers clash" be the most intuitive way of opposing an incoming swing's power ? Shouldn't you rather match opposite movement with your legs to counter its force -> PB system based on movement directions (i don't know much about real sword fighting but @SeV does i think) ? Or it could be done the same way as this upcoming JKO mod that looks so great (can't remember the name - @ent can you remind me please), i.e. if i'm not mistaken trigger a blocking animation when camera accelerates/moves in a direction; so you'd PB if you moved the camera in the right direction (in this mod i think PB detection still relies on saber/saber collision, but due to blocking anims triggering in correct directions based on camera movement, PBs do trigger reliably when blocking swings from the appropriate directions - well, would need to test extensively to really know). This system is really good because the PB detection actually uses the blocking animations, rather than having to aim your idle saber into a swing then a directional blocking animation triggering that looks off because it displaces your saber in another direction slightly. However is having blocking animations trigger in the air all the time due to camera movement plausible for a mod like mb2, i'm not so sure about that. In any case this JKO mod is probably the best that the "old PB system" can get. We would have to see, but there's a chance that it's actually a reliable system. I don't see any other way, using the animations from the original game, to make a reliable blocking system based on saber/saber collision (except again making saber hitboxes larger).

More practically, if you are worried that offense is too weak and PB is way too easy to perform in the current patch, then new things are addressing that in the new patch. For starters the PBing zones are also being made smaller.

In any case i should say this: PB detection is still subject to change even after next patch. If a reliable method can be found and tested appropriately, which has advantages compared to the current one, then i have no problem with it; after all it doesn't really change the balance of the system at all, as long as the difficulty to perform successful PBs remains similar.


EDIT: i remembered the name of the JKO mod, Boothand. Actually the developer has been trying out several types of blocking, not just the one i described but also blocking based on movement.
 
Last edited:
Posts
125
Likes
63
Movement based blocking isn't all that intuitive, imo. Neither is attacking, but JKA was built on that. Most people would always want to move away from swings, but deflect the attack with their sword, always in a fluid motion. I always found Mblock's directions to be weird as well as I don't want to move into an uppercut swing, I want to move away just as any other swing. Perhaps something mixed, Left/Right controlled with movement, and Up/Down controlled with camera pitch?
Regardless of what it actually ends up as, I just want it crisp and clear. Once you understand it, it should prove to be useful with practice with no luck factor.
 

Darthsnoke212

Banned
Posts
2
Likes
1
Oh my Fking god if this retarded bullshit is true and not just some fake lie attempt at getting everybody hyped up for nothing I'll be reverting my game back to 1.2 and hosting my own Movie Battles 1.2 Only Server and I'm 83% sure enough people will play to form a community that does not play this new shit -.-
 

ent

Movie Battles II Team
Posts
848
Likes
390
There are 2 ways to block: by camera movements and by keys holding.
The name is Saber Shenanigans.
Stassin
 
Posts
277
Likes
212
if the saber system isn't going to be changed before the next patch can you guys at least like, do a dev diary on it or something?
 

Supa

The Serial Stacker
Movie Battles II Team Retired
Posts
914
Likes
356
That's up to Stassin if he wants or has time to do it.
 

Spaghetti

Ghost
R2D2
Movie Battles II Team Retired
Posts
1,637
Likes
1,640
if the saber system isn't going to be changed before the next patch can you guys at least like, do a dev diary on it or something?
What? You want a dev diary on nothing changing? Okay:
Developer Diary said:
Nothing has changed.

Phew, that was tough. :p
 
Posts
277
Likes
212
isn't going to be changed from the currently implemented beta system........

edit: ie, release ready such that you can post it and not worry about "we showed changes and then we didnt implement, what a mistake we shouldnt have done that"
 

Supa

The Serial Stacker
Movie Battles II Team Retired
Posts
914
Likes
356
isn't going to be changed from the currently implemented beta system........

edit: ie, release ready such that you can post it and not worry about "we showed changes and then we didnt implement, what a mistake we shouldnt have done that"
Yeah I don't do that. I won't go into details, but I'm relatively happy with what we've got so far. It feels like a step in the right direction.
 
Posts
277
Likes
212
just to clarify, i originally meant

if the current changes are final and ready to be implemented, it would be nice if a dev diary is posted

if they could be subject to further change and testing, i understand not making a dev diary about possibly unfinished content
 

Supa

The Serial Stacker
Movie Battles II Team Retired
Posts
914
Likes
356
just to clarify, i originally meant

if the current changes are final and ready to be implemented, it would be nice if a dev diary is posted
Yeah, that's entirely up to stassin. It's his system, and he understands the changes that were made and the direction the system was taken in better than almost anybody.
if they could be subject to further change and testing, i understand not making a dev diary about possibly unfinished content
As far as I know there will be no more tweaks.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top