- Posts
- 1,912
- Likes
- 2,672
Was it correct in making the map function correctly? Yes. Absolutely.
Then why didnt you distribute your solution if you're so fucking smart?
Was it correct in making the map function correctly? Yes. Absolutely.
Because why on earth would I expect the community. Who doesn't use the forums. To actually do this, and enough people to do it to get a server even remotely populated. I'm sure you know the answer to your questions so I'm not sure why you ask them. I know you're smart.Then why didnt you distribute your solution if you're so fucking smart?
You just proved the entire community right just to make it look like you have IRL friends, wtf?Ppl are too extra 😂" that they sent after sharing an update. About 8 of us in the group were laughing at everyone's responses to things as we were sitting in the airport.
I don't know exactly what was that conversation you're talking about because I didn't eye witnessed it, but the problem with your approach is that you shouldn't ask devs about your solution at the first place, and test it by yourself instead, then create a thread similar to mine.My solution worked and <...>
This is correct, it would of been a better idea to not talk to the devs at all for obvious reasons. That was a mistake on my part to even let them know about it.I don't know exactly what was that conversation you're talking about because I didn't eye witnessed it, but the problem with your approach is that you shouldn't ask devs about your solution at the first place, and test it by yourself instead, then create a thread similar to mine.
Ever since 1.6 was released, they were dropping hints about they data-mined dotf somewhere, and it was obvious they wouldn't give a true answer if you literally pointed a finger at it and then said: "is balcony dotf placed here?".This is correct, it would of been a better idea to not talk to the devs at all for obvious reasons. That was a mistake on my part to even let them know about it.
Yeah I get what you're saying, it was my mistake as I previously said to talk with the devs in the first place. However the reason I did was actually to call them out on their BS. I showed them that balc dotf worked and that it was false that it wasn't completed yet (their story). I showed the screenshots like you did of the working balc dotf. And like you said they said it wasn't the correct answer. Even though it was obviously A correct answer.Ever since 1.6 was released, they were dropping hints about they data-mined dotf somewhere, and it was obvious they wouldn't give a true answer if you literally pointed a finger at it and then said: "is balcony dotf placed here?".
Because data-mining is some kind a game: they mine something, if you find it you don't ask people who hid it, you yell "LOOK I FOUND IT" instead, so everybody could here ya.
To be fair to mace. This wasn't his idea. As far as I know it was Sweg who brought up the idea to the team in the first place.this is one of the cringiest things ive ever read.
Mace you really need to fucking sort it out bro I can only offer so much sympathy when it comes to how the community in general treat you, even in spite of the amount of effort you put into the mod. Your attitude here is just unbelievable, you really need to drop the cocky attitude, or better yet just cease interaction with members of the community on the forums before you stain MBII's reputation any further
Whether this was intentionally put in the build or not, your responses to this thread basically come across as a massive fuck you to the community