Search results

People follow players counts, not what has RTV vs what doesnt. We have so low players and those players at any given time dont have the patience to sit and fill a RTV server. It has been proven time and time again that once someone has the time and patience those RTV servers will get populated...

So, this is all completely untrue. It would just be a transfer of a power away from the server owners to the community itself. If the community who plays on that server wants to constantly play DOTF they still can with the "Stay Here" button. The same freedoms are all there just who has the...

Known and already fixed for next version.

Yeah, it isn't really a restriction to the core game design like some of our other limits which makes it not really a good idea to limit. I am personally more with what Defiant said. Integrating RTV and making it mandatory. Updating it with proper UI and things like this...

You were talking about us not communicating no? Whether or not you like/think the changes are the best is an entirely different thing.

Uh, November- early March had a CRAP ton of updates both in dev diaries and patches going. The only the last month or so that has been a bit barren so far in terms of "official" updates. But a lot of it is just you not really paying attention. Increasing The Playerbase Launcher Updates and...

I don't think this would be easy to do. Planned. Waiting on code support so it gets actual key binds rather than just defaults. Planned. Waiting till Starushka has time to make the actual menus for the tutorials for this.

Going to need a bit more information. Was this on an official server? If so make a thread here: Reports and unban requests If it was on another server such as tR, AOD, BG, etc. you will need to make a post on their forums and talk to the admins of those servers.

There are some lightsaber/dueling updates being worked on and most people making the guides have been waiting on that to update them. We are also internally planning an official tutorial for it but it is a long ways off. It is the last one on my list to work on because it is also the most...

As far as I am aware, it isn't on our end.

Might be a good idea once we get that done. He contacted me years ago just to use some of my work as a background in his videos.

You can time waste even if the round isnt close to ending. It is also a good way to slow development down to a crawl if I have to wait minimum one week for even the smallest change to be approved by the community. Especially when they've never played changes.

I am not really sure what a hilt should be but player models have their LOD0 at around 6k triangles. The N1 starfighters for example are 1.5k triangles. What you have there is way above what JKA can handle and needs to be reduced drastically for it to work. 40k triangles is above what the...

Ben has kind of spilled the beans here. This is something Sno, Defiant, Mcbober, myself have largely been working on for the past few weeks. The rest of both th dev and beta team have been providing feedback as we go. It is far from a simple task but we want to do it right. I also wanted to wait...

While this is pretty true JKA is really old and even though we decoupled quite a few things from framerate when we increased the server fps from 20 to 40 I think there may be a few things that still are.

I would still like to fix it for mandos since people tunnel vision a lot. I don't particularly want to make them destroyable. Partially because of the model change. Electrifying is a maybe. Could have it shootable but it sends an electrifying shock up instead of destroying.

There were some spots on the farther away pillars where you could go and not be seen/shot at from. I had a choice of whether to block off just those parts or block them all off for the sake of consistency. I had literally minutes to do it and the simple solution was to simply block it off. As I...

It is Lessen. The information was updated I just hadn't updated the actual list yet.

For the sake of transparency here are how some of the things were chosen. First, there were threads like this one by Soldier Timewasting Places that have a ton of places that bother him and other people in maps. And there are more threads than this one. Secondly, we have an internal list of...

I think this would be a good thing to do, but I think your solution just runs into the same problems. It shouldn't be accurate to individual FOV settings and should be accurate regardless of what people have it set to. Scoped vs not scoped should definitely change the fire point.