Search results

Personally, I would like it so that if you are firing at the time they stun/shock you, you continue firing (electricity forcing your muscles to stay in position kinda logic). This has both advantages and disadvantages for the lightning user as well as the gunner. Draining ammo maybe even...

Well imo to improve first person I wouldn't remove the sway, or put put weapon models center. I would make a more accurate sway, make sure all weapon ray casts are accurate, put clip ammo numbers on the side of guns like I did with EC and what JKG does, add weapon animations, use render to...

We could, but it is also if its worth the time when we have a crap ton of other things to do. Especially one that needs finishing before solo comes out and hasn't been started code wise yet. While first person isn't perfect, I play with it almost exclusively and just switch to third person...

I believe we have a limited number of total cvars we can add to the game (I could be wrong but I swear I have heard it several times from multiple coders). This one is probably not worth a slot. JKA's method isn't really built around matrix math and is pretty basic in comparison yes. Just...

I know you said that probably should have been a bit more clear, but it isn't something you can just change on the fly or very easily. A lot of these sway, look, etc animations in video games are based on matrix mathematics which is pretty simple for a computer to do but can be complicated to...

It isn't built for what you are trying to do. :P

I don't know if it is something I will have the time to fix as I am working on something fairly important but it is on the list of map fixes we have to do. Hex should do it as he is active now and it is his map. But if he doesn't I will get to it eventually, or sno will but he is also...

They'll be back next winter don't worry.

People find a way anyway. Those stupid dancing proj fights are stupid.

Exactly because it has 6 shots. If you do this and keep the current limit, you keep the primary aspect of the weapon, just limit their choices by not having two primary weapons or making having two primaries less viable point wise.

That wouldn't make it a utility weapon, it would make it a primary weapon. Because since you wouldn't be using ammo, you would have less reason to dump points into e-11 or pistol.

That is likely a bit too far in my opinion.

There is no need for consistency there. It would just be consistency for the sake of it, and take away variance in some of the weapons. Westars in general are likely more high quality than the average blaster. Therefore can charge slightly faster or whatever it is for example.

Exactly. Its a utility weapon. not a primary weapon.

Eh, every bit of play I have had around the new objective seems to make me pretty happy with my decision, even if its going against the grain of the community on that one. Balance is more important in many cases. It seems to be much better to play in and around in many respects with the recent...

The old one made me so angry to the point I would stop playing MB2. Being balanced is better.

Still missing the point about what I'm saying where having classic vs not having it doesn't include what the community thinks for the first little bit. Because they need a minimum few months to adjust to the map to give unbiased, non knee jerk reactions to something that had a previous revision...

Im fairly indifferent about it. Could be an interesting addition to force whore only builds. But I think some of the potential things I and others want to do are a bit more interesting. I don't think it would be difficult to code either.

That was the change I was talking about doing next. Redoing T-Junc and the side routes again. It is also why I am doing it last as its the most extensive change. Though it might have to wait until after you know what. People like Mark make me not want to even bother though because I am taking...

Comm tower classic, jedi temple classic, tantive classic, etc were all not immediately added after their respective changes and there was no uproar. The same policy that applied then, applies now. But somehow now its criticized as being a tantrum throwing move by ignorant community members even...