Search results

We've all waited long enough for a good build, implement what you can from the above piece by piece over time. I don't think anyone would mind waiting more time to get SeV's suggestions implemented. You could even release small patches for every block of suggestions that SeV has made, i.e...

I didn't like 1.5 for many reasons, and I think most people in the community know I've been asking for 1.4.9 to return for a long time, but I figured reverting to 1.5.x (a later build with less jank) might have been more of a realistic ask due to the difficulty in reverting patches (so we were...

These suggested changes aren't necessarily my idea of a perfect build, but they are very, very close to that. Thank you for taking the time to write this. The above in particular I'm not a fan of. Whilst I understand the sentiment, I just think movement, playermodels, animations etc are too...

Half of the added janky mechanics introduced in r20 are unwanted by most if not all players though, such as ‘mb defence’ etc. I’m fairly sure most people just want a system with pb, mb, parries (that work), combos, halfswings, counters (that work), swingblock, slaps and a simple ACM design We...

What happened

Revert to 1.5.x sabering and fix the few minor things that were wrong with it. Parry/counter timings didn’t work correctly/consistently and some of the styles were too OP due to interrupts. There was probably other small things that needed changing but not to the point of requiring an overhaul...

How do I change my brightness with vulcan rendering?

I think mb defence and things like different pb defence levels after feinting or in returns (if I understood correctly) is just unnecessary complication too. The proposed change to ACM sounds good.

I personally do not want a flavourful or more interesting patch. Thats what I’m trying to say. I want a good, basic patch that allows you to be creative and play in many different ways even with one style (i.e yellow or red). 1.4.9 almost had this. You could play aggressive as spamming was still...

The period before that was consisting of wild beta builds from Stassin and Tempest. From 1.3 to 1.4 a tonne of features were added and subsequently removed (pb counters, semi pb, perfect parry). From 1.4 to 1.5 basically the entire meta was changed in what would’ve been a decent build with a few...

And once again I give up reasoning with you. Why would my post have gained so much support in a small period of time if I was wrong lol. We have no chance of getting through to you if every time the community supports an opinion you just say ‘no, u’. We literally havent had a single tweak to...

Haven’t had time to go through Tempest’s response yet, but this just isn’t true? The reason we’re in this state is because of the fact we’ve constantly overhauled new builds rather than tweak them. How do you reply to a thread which’s core argument is that ‘mb2 sabering builds need to be...

But do you agree with the overall premise of what I'm saying? That's the important part

Not going to make this into an Achilles-esque post where I write a 6000 word essay on sabering, but I have just read the proposed sabering changes and I am mindblown once again. Please show support to what I'm saying if you agree with me or obviously if you disagree make it known too. Please...

Is there a way to switch back to the old font? I want it to look like the below: not like this modern style thats in the game now

or just give the community what they've been asking for for yrs. and would only take 30 mins tops to implement. infinite round timers, vicinity based text chat. tempest already included the latter in a beta test years ago

mustve taken that with a iPod 4g did you

Could use some formatting makes me not want to read it given that it's just massive splurges of text

SK5 20 Oct @ 8:34am Poorly written with a lot of misguided opinionated information